After last week and being a 1 point underdog this week it sounds like the Gordon game could be a good one to see.gohorns40":275u39ce said:If you are speaking to the number of times the west talks about itself and the rankings being top-loaded with west teams, please understand "it ain't bragging if you can do it". They can do it.
Best regards,
East Supporter
Hook 'em!
tobyvann":2grym0jr said:My thoughts is a lot of the numbers he's saying he uses relies on such as strength of schedule which he's looking back last year. Take Woodson for example they didn't play last year do to loosing a player due to injury. But they rank above teams that played and and won. I'm sure there's several teams that lost 5-9 seniors that's not looked at either. Don't get me wrong most the top choices are good but it's your middle rankings that relies on more west than central and east.
51eleven":3ul6bjzn said:tobyvann":3ul6bjzn said:My thoughts is a lot of the numbers he's saying he uses relies on such as strength of schedule which he's looking back last year. Take Woodson for example they didn't play last year do to loosing a player due to injury. But they rank above teams that played and and won. I'm sure there's several teams that lost 5-9 seniors that's not looked at either. Don't get me wrong most the top choices are good but it's your middle rankings that relies on more west than central and east.
You do know the Guru really uses a dart board of Texas with sixman towns on it and only "works" on it after sampling Goob's evercleer?
Caprock kid":pt8npdup said:51eleven":pt8npdup said:tobyvann":pt8npdup said:My thoughts is a lot of the numbers he's saying he uses relies on such as strength of schedule which he's looking back last year. Take Woodson for example they didn't play last year do to loosing a player due to injury. But they rank above teams that played and and won. I'm sure there's several teams that lost 5-9 seniors that's not looked at either. Don't get me wrong most the top choices are good but it's your middle rankings that relies on more west than central and east.
You do know the Guru really uses a dart board of Texas with sixman towns on it and only "works" on it after sampling Goob's evercleer?
Makes sense Paducah is still under MC and MC didn't even play 10:00 min of a game.
THAT_GUY_SHELTON":pf1ywbjn said:Buckholts-demolished
Mt.Calm- were better than easily
Calvert- played great on offense, a little shy on defense at first, but last 7 plays, they didn't score and picked it off once.
THAT_GUY_SHELTON":sddfgfrk said:Mt.Calm.....better than Aggieland? No sir. If you noticed the plays played in the scrimmage. Aggieland ran simple tight plays the first 5 plays for simple plays. As soon as they went spread, scored on first play, and then again on play 8. I too am a scout. I am not taking anything away from Mt.Calm at all. Coath Satcher is a phenomenal coach and will do good things with them, but in a real game, could not match up against Aggieland. There spreadback is phenomenal and will go all state. As I expect Mt.Calm defensive end/running back(sophomore boy who was hurt in wreck) to do when he heals. But the reason Mt.Calm did so well against calvert is bc they play good D against the tight formation. But struggle against the spread. We will see Come the end of the year.
Looking at Mt.Calm week 1......not as good as you say. Especially if you say they are as good as calvert