Positivemessages
Six-man pro
He did not know that he had spoke to the kid? How is that speculation?
UIL State Executive Committee to Meet (Richland Springs)
- Thread starter Mike
- Start date
- Status
HaustinBurkhart2
Six-man fan
When he called he had no idea what the call was about or that the kid was wanting to transfer. It’s not like he got a message from the kid saying hey call me I want to come play for you and then my dad called or answered. He answered an unknown number. And when asked what do I do, he told him you can’t move for athletic purposes. Either way, 14 minutes of listening to the kid spill out his issues or just a 30 second phone call ending with my Dad saying the same thing and hanging up, The kid still moved to RS. So it wouldn’t matter how long the call was.
HaustinBurkhart2
Six-man fan
Once again. Coaches don’t fill them out. Parents do in front of coaches. You have His dad filling it out in RS and his mom filling it out in Mullin.
Positivemessages
Six-man pro
Ok so your dad told the kid you can’t transfer for athletics, with the dad there they mark no they had not spoke to him prior to him transferring. The mom was honest and said yes.
Positivemessages
Six-man pro
Your dad knew better or the father and your dad would have marked yes on 16
HaustinBurkhart2
Six-man fan
PAPF #16
Did anyone from the new school contact the student prior to their enrollment in the new school?
Did coach Burkhart Contact this kid? No. Coach Burkhart did not Reach out and Contact him.
HaustinBurkhart2
Six-man fan
It doesn’t ask if there was any contact between school and student before enrollment.
Helping a kid is commendable, but the moment RS accepted the transfer and tried to get him eligible for varsity play... it went from helping a kid to helping RS. You can try to explain it away as being innocent, and it probably was innocent, but the only way to prove that is... Do not accept the transfer or tell the kid no sports at RS.
Texas Rebel
Six-man fan
Were you there ? Was the DEC there ? Was the SEC there ? I didn't think so.
Texas Rebel
Six-man fan
What in the hell or you talking about ?
HaustinBurkhart2
Six-man fan
I somewhat can agree but the kid fought for eligibility not RS. Notice, at the meeting no one testified from RS to have him eligible.
Texas Rebel
Six-man fan
You consistently spin your words to fit your confusing and absurd narratives.
Bending the rules is teaching kids poor character. Everyone knows what the question is asking when it asks about prior contact. Go ahead and "say" it's right, but be prepared to defend and have to deal with the shadow that bending rules places over your program.
HaustinBurkhart2
Six-man fan
RS and Mullin are Rivals? Since when? RS and Cherokee, RS and Strawn, RS and Calvert are rivals. Not Mullin and RS.
HaustinBurkhart2
Six-man fan
That’s not bending the rules. That’s a straight forward question. Bending it to fit suit of taking down a coach on speculation is poor character.
It really would and did matter. If it was a 30 second conversation.. and then JB notifies all appropriate parties about what just happened- then there is zero doubt in my mind he is on the sideline next week when RS returns to play.
Texas Rebel
Six-man fan
"Neither does anyone else ?" Then what did the UIL SEC base their rulings on ? All heresay and speculation.
Texas Rebel
Six-man fan
You make absolutely no sense.
I think it's safe to say that nobody has anything constructive, or additional, to add to this conversation. If you do, bring it up. Otherwise, let's just stop all this back and forth bickering that's going on. It's pretty clear nobody is changing their mind about how they feel things went down and it feels like some of y'all are just chasing your tails at this point.
So...let's quit this and move on to something else...I hear there may be some football games or something going on starting tomorrow night...maybe we could talk about those in another thread?
So...let's quit this and move on to something else...I hear there may be some football games or something going on starting tomorrow night...maybe we could talk about those in another thread?
HaustinBurkhart2
Six-man fan
I’m sorry but I strongly disagree. When Coach Williamson texted my Dad it was not a courtesy text. It was him assuming my Dad was talking to his player/s. This is not the first time Coach Williamson has accused my Dad. So why would you contact that coach again? If he would have let Williamson know, Williamson would have said. See…. Here is the proof you were talking to him (prior to his actual phone call with the student. My dad thought it was best to report it to our superintendent and leave it at that. Who else is there to inform? The coach who has already accused you for years? Idk about you but I just report to my boss. I don’t call another company and inform them of what’s going on.
Dad also willingly got AT&T phone records to show he never reached out to the kid.
- Status
