Rankings

This must be your first year to follow the rankings. Up until last year, the East completely dominated the top 10.

One more thing. Granger will put the rankings up when he gets all the scores in and he has a chance to fire up The Toy and wait for it to finish totally screwing over all the teams from the east.

This is the second week in a row someone has started a thread asking when the rankings will be up. It's still early Sunday afternoon, and the noobs are already impatient.
 
Do you want it fair or just? Who cares in September where a team is ranked? For that matter, Who cares how they are ranked in December? The answer is determined on the field.
 
they were up right at noon. no idea why this thread started... had not updated the main page to reflect that though, sorry
 
granger":102oruwn said:
they were up right at noon. no idea why this thread started... had not updated the main page to reflect that though, sorry
Dear Head Illuminati,
Don't apologize, it's a sign of weakness. The jackals will surround you and start nipping at you.
 
The headline showed to still be Week 3 Rankings, but when you clicked on it, it showed to be week 5 Ratings, so im sure that is why the thread got started....jmo
 
sixmanfan3":36iv2lh7 said:
The headline showed to still be Week 3 Rankings, but when you clicked on it, it showed to be week 5 Ratings, so im sure that is why the thread got started....jmo

Can't be week 5 rankings. Week 5 has yet to be played.
 
Dear Head Illuminati,
I don't think it is right that you have Oglesby ranked higher than Star. Obviously you like Eastern teams more than Western teams.
Please fix this immediately
 
rainjacktx":2g6rh6mw said:
sixmanfan3":2g6rh6mw said:
The headline showed to still be Week 3 Rankings, but when you clicked on it, it showed to be week 5 Ratings, so im sure that is why the thread got started....jmo

Can't be week 5 rankings. Week 5 has yet to be played.

So preseason rankings are actually previous year week 15 rankings? I would speculate you are correct, but they are still preseason rankings, as this is week 5 rankings. I certainly don't know. That would explain why there is so much movement that gets more accurate as the season progresses. It seems to me that is common sense. But maybe this will help all the folks that don't get that. I like to read these boards, they are fun. But for the sake of peace, I say Aquilla and Abbott should be 1 and 2. Flip a coin for placement.
 
SimplyPut":2no01khl said:
rainjacktx":2no01khl said:
sixmanfan3":2no01khl said:
The headline showed to still be Week 3 Rankings, but when you clicked on it, it showed to be week 5 Ratings, so im sure that is why the thread got started....jmo

Can't be week 5 rankings. Week 5 has yet to be played.

So preseason rankings are actually previous year week 15 rankings? I would speculate you are correct, but they are still preseason rankings, as this is week 5 rankings. I certainly don't know. That would explain why there is so much movement that gets more accurate as the season progresses. It seems to me that is common sense. But maybe this will help all the folks that don't get that. I like to read these boards, they are fun. But for the sake of peace, I say Aquilla and Abbott should be 1 and 2. Flip a coin for placement.


These are the rankings after week 4. There were no week zero rankings until after week zero was complete. All there was during week 0 were the preseason rankings - which is a completely different animal than week 15 rankings from last season.
 
Back
Top