coachjdjones
11-man fan
And I was not basing my argument on your man card, I was basin it as you using a second tier spot as your example.
CowboyP":3mjyyo5f said:I'm not trying to stir the pot. I just want to see some other teams increase their level of play. IMO, that will make things much more exciting.
smokeyjoe53":i9jcnnnq said:I started not to even bring it up but topher mentioned he failed to see socialistic tendencies in his premise. This is an overly simplistic definition of socialism but to me it basically is the sacrifice of one for the good of many.
Is that not what you were saying.
BTW, I have officially named Topher & Cowboy " Chief Potstirrers"................
coachjdjones":i9jcnnnq said:And I was not basing my argument on your man card, I was basin it as you using a second tier spot as your example.
coachjdjones":i9jcnnnq said:Ok, you're last post explains a ton.
Here in Texas, not many care about soccer or hockey. In Texas, sixman football will not be ruined by one team's dominance. If that bores you, then this sport isn't important to you as it is to us. I guess what I'm trying to say is: I guess you might as well watch soccer and hockey.
I'll smell better Saturday evening. I take a bath every Saturday even if I don't need it.Johnny South":srhh0zp6 said:CowboyP":srhh0zp6 said:I'm not trying to stir the pot. I just want to see some other teams increase their level of play. IMO, that will make things much more exciting.
If you had only said that in the first place instead of agreeing with that pile of crap that topher80 posted, you would have come out smelling a lot better.
topher80":1nr7lj8y said:Fair enough Coach. But I disagree with you about how I feel about six-man ball. I'm a teacher/coach here in the frozen wasteland called Canada. I started following six-man ball about 6 years ago, joined the forum 4 years ago. For a couple of years now, I have sponsored a school so that they can have their games broadcast on the radio. The only games I have ever seen are the ones which coaches send me on DVD and the for the last two years the stream of the state championships. Either I am nuts and I should be watching hockey/soccer or I love this game so much that every Friday night in the autumn, I stream as many games as I can on two laptops, a desktop, and a tablet. Any chance you have a Marfa football hat you'd be willing to sell me?
SixFan19":1y63c7fd said:Six-Man is as strong as it has ever been in Texas as far as participation goes. With all of the private schools playing the game now and new UIL teams getting into the mix there are easily more teams playing the game in the state than ever before. Last season there were roughly 250 schools playing six-man, compare that to the 80 or so teams that were playing it in the 1980's.
Having all of those private/home school schools in the mix has created a different landscape for the sport. We now have teams that are infused into public schools' schedules that aren't always governed by the same set of rules as public schools. Sometimes this creates a big advantage for the private schools, but only a handful are highly competitive. On the other hand, most of the private schools that participate in football do not put near the effort into it as most public schools. I for one am not thrilled to see competitive UIL teams being forced into filling their non-district schedules with private teams because the low lying public schools they once played don't want to play a team that takes football seriously.
I think it is safe to say that out of the 250 teams playing last year only about 50 of those had competitive programs. Of that 50 there were only about 15 to 20 that you could classify as "playoff worthy". When you then split that up between the divisions (2 in UIL, and the many private divisions) it really gets watered down. Just look at the playoff game scores. Sure Throckmorton and Richland Springs dominated all of their playoff opponents, but look at what those opponents did to the teams they faced in the playoffs. Take Gordon and Abbott, DI East Semifinalists, they both 45ed their first 3 playoff opponents but were still considered average teams by the six-man "intellectuals". What does that say about all of those teams those two "average" programs demolished along the way? To me it says that the real problem in UIL Six-Man is the two division split which allows too many "non playoff worthy" teams into the tournament only to get hammered by the first "average" team they face.
The problems with two divisions go much deeper than a flimsy playoff bracket. Just look at some of the districts that have had to be constructed with teams having to travel two hours to district games, passing a dozen other DII Six-Man schools along the way. It would be interesting to see how much more schools are paying for fuel after the split. Not only that but the 5 team average district has been diminished to 4 in most cases. If a team was bad before the split, they are still bad for the same reasons but now get to be humiliated under the spotlight of the playoffs.
Just think about how much more competitive the district races and playoffs would have been just last year. Bottom line, six-man does not have enough competitive teams to split. If they want more teams to get trophies start a flag football league open to teams that had a losing record the year before.
It doesn't matter if a team has a string of dominance. There is a cycle for everything and those winning a lot right now will eventually cycle out. They may very well stay relevant for a long time though. The dynasties of the sport give other teams something to strive for and they also attract state-wide and national attention from time to time. The 1990's were primarily dominated by Panther Creek and Gordon, while Richland Springs couldn't stay on the field with them. There came a time when the roles were reversed. Richland Springs' number will be up soon enough, for those of you that wish it to happen. Until then, enjoy the ride and hope that your team ends up at least "average" by the time the playoffs roll around.
CowboyP":36irdyz3 said:I agree with topher. I respect Coach Burkhart, Coach Rogers, and the RS players for what they have accomplished. Unfortunately, the continued success of one team can lower interest in the sport.
I do hope RS loses this year - not because they are down, but because another team stepped up their game.