District Champions

Whoever drafted it did not do a good job...I would say who ever drafted and typed it up made bad errors/typos/cut&paste job

What is clear is it is a 24 point system and it uses cumulative points based on the 3 teams involved only. It should be without a doubt 1. Newcastle 2. Knox City and 3. Perrin. Then the question is is there then a debate that once the two playoff teams are picked you then do another adjustment usuing head to head...to rank the remaining 2 teams. IDK...either that was what was previously agreed upon or it is a bad job of typing up the rules by the district chair...I would think it would be obvious which is the case if everyone was being honest....the fact that this is happening now after the fact is crazy.

Based on the 3 team 24 point system the top two teams based on points are Newcastle and Knox City...that is clear

Because of this I am curious if a Bi-District opponent has ever challenged a district on who their opponent should be? In this case I would think district 5 could possibly have a complaint about who district 6 selects as their #1 and #2...has any coach ever challenged their opponent like this?
 
The D2 District 6 was a lot clearer. Those rules sound like something that 2A-6A with 4 teams advancing would do. Looks like Newcastle is first, and Knox City is second. If three teams tie for first place, all three are tri-champions. A tiebreaker will determine who goes to the playoffs. The point system will be used to determine first and second place. Then head-to-head will determine seeding first and second place. Newcastle first Knox City second. The rest of that tiebreaker rule applies to district that send more than 2 teams to playoffs
 
Last edited:
If Perrin-Whitt had scored again and got the two point kick and won by 14, would it have changed the current outcome? Was listening to it on the broadcast and hollering for them to call a timeout and score one more time. Was baffled why they let the clock run out. Were they out of timeouts?
 
phimutau said:
If Perrin-Whitt had scored again and got the two point kick and won by 14, would it have changed the current outcome? Was listening to it on the broadcast and hollering for them to call a timeout and score one more time. Was baffled why they let the clock run out. Were they out of timeouts?
Click to expand...
not sure, but i have no idea who is winning that district
 
phimutau said:
If Perrin-Whitt had scored again and got the two point kick and won by 14, would it have changed the current outcome? Was listening to it on the broadcast and hollering for them to call a timeout and score one more time. Was baffled why they let the clock run out. Were they out of timeouts?
Click to expand...
Yes...if Perrin won by 14 then if they used the 24 point system to places all three teams Perrin would be 2nd with -10 and KC would have been 3rd with -12
 
As I understand it here are the arguments:

A. The system is used to rank the teams involved and that is the final order
1. Newcastle 22
2. KC -4
3. PW -18

B. The system is used to rank the three teams to determine the two playoff teams, THEN head to head is used to seed those two
1. KC (in on points, beat Newcastle)
2. Newcastle (in on points lost to KC)
3. PW

C. The system is used to find the team with the most points, it makes that team champ, THEN only head to head is used to decide the runner-up
1. Newcastle (22 points the most)
2. PW (beat KC head to head)
3. KC

Good luck to the district committee trying to sort this out
 
Mike said:
Right now I think both sides are in agreement that Newcastle is the district champ, assuming they win this week. The question is, will Knox City or Perrin-Whitt be the district runner-up?
Click to expand...
ok i see, i work with Valley alot and i know that if they beat Petersburg on Friday they are in the playoffs and will play the district champ of that said district
 
Leman Saunders said:
As I understand it here are the arguments:

A. The system is used to rank the teams involved and that is the final order
1. Newcastle 22
2. KC -4
3. PW -18

B. The system is used to rank the three teams to determine the two playoff teams, THEN head to head is used to seed those two
1. KC (in on points, beat Newcastle)
2. Newcastle (in on points lost to KC)
3. PW

C. The system is used to find the team with the most points, it makes that team champ, THEN only head to head is used to decide the runner-up
1. Newcastle (22 points the most)
2. PW (beat KC head to head)
3. KC

Good luck to the district committee trying to sort this out
Click to expand...
totally confusing,
 
Leman Saunders said:
As I understand it here are the arguments:

A. The system is used to rank the teams involved and that is the final order
1. Newcastle 22
2. KC -4
3. PW -18

B. The system is used to rank the three teams to determine the two playoff teams, THEN head to head is used to seed those two
1. KC (in on points, beat Newcastle)
2. Newcastle (in on points lost to KC)
3. PW

C. The system is used to find the team with the most points, it makes that team champ, THEN only head to head is used to decide the runner-up
1. Newcastle (22 points the most)
2. PW (beat KC head to head)
3. KC

Good luck to the district committee trying to sort this out
Click to expand...
patriotfan21 said:
ok i see, i work with Valley alot and i know that if they beat Petersburg on Friday they are in the playoffs and will play the district champ of that said district
Click to expand...
Mike said:
Right now I think both sides are in agreement that Newcastle is the district champ, assuming they win this week. The question is, will Knox City or Perrin-Whitt be the district runner-up?
Click to expand...
so in other words KC's win over Newcastle means nothing because Newcastle still wins based on points
 
patriotfan21 said:
so in other words KC's win over Newcastle means nothing because Newcastle still wins based on points
Click to expand...
Well, according to Leman's scenario B, it does matter. I hadn't heard an argument for that yet, so I just assumed everyone involved was ceding to Newcastle as the district champion.
 
Mike said:
Well, according to Leman's scenario B, it does matter. I hadn't heard an argument for that yet, so I just assumed everyone involved was ceding to Newcastle as the district champion.
Click to expand...
"The point system will be used to determine first and second place (Newcastle & KC). THEN head to head will determine seeding first place and second place (KC beat Newcastle)."

If those two independent sentences are taken literally...KC is champ and Newcastle is runner up.

However...these two sentences are in obvious contradiction to the rest of the paragraph IMO
 
Leman Saunders said:
Yes...if Perrin won by 14 then if they used the 24 point system to places all three teams Perrin would be 2nd with -10 and KC would have been 3rd with -12
Click to expand...
they will have the same problem in district 1 if Happy loses to Nazareth on friday, because then Happy, Nazareth and Springlake Earth would have a 3-way tie and they would've all beaten each other
 

Similar threads

B
Bi-District Champs?
Replies
19
Views
5K
DOWNBOX
DOWNBOX
SimplyPut
Garden City @ Rankin Nov 5 for District Championship
Replies
11
Views
2K
The voice
T
Roach
Will Wildorado take Groom for the district championship?
Replies
0
Views
762
Roach
Roach
I
District championship Motley Co vs jayton
Replies
0
Views
792
Ilovefridaynights
I
I
Motley co vs jayton nov 5th for district championship
2 3
Replies
44
Views
6K
Ilovefridaynights
I
Back
Top