FCSA football
Six-man fan
I’ll have whatever he’s having !MilfordInsider":2fywntyx said:McLean was the better team... Smith still the better player.
I’ll have whatever he’s having !MilfordInsider":2fywntyx said:McLean was the better team... Smith still the better player.
MilfordInsider":25luv7q1 said:McLean was the better team... Smith still the better player.
Was waiting for this one, I would say against that Milford team in that game, yes...but I know McLean is probably disappointed that they allowed 70 and Milford for allowing 100...but yes I stand by that both teams played great.videojoe":3cghgof4 said:Is giving up 70 "playing great"?
If you are going to make comparisons, the logical thing to do is reverse things.oldfolks":ydjd0e5q said:Milford Insider and all others that think Taron was the best athletes on the field and in six-man this year. Wrong!!! He was maybe the third best athlete on the field and his brother might have pushed him to #4. If he would work on his attitude he might move to #2. He will make contact if it is forced on him. He made a couple of good tackles but he misses more than he made. Milford Insider, you have a lot of crow to eat so take a bite at a time and let the message board rest and try to gain a few friends for a change instead of making Milford Bulldog haters.
True. McLean had the better team. McLean's defensive discipline allowed them to slow down TaRon's shake and bake scrambles. McLean scheme allowed them to be where they were needed all game long. TaRon broke some good runs but even TaRon can't do it all. He needed more help. Like a few timely blocks and a better offensive philosophy. Did you notice that on Milburn's spread set Taron was about 12 yards BEHIND the line of scrimmage on most offensive sets. So not only was TaRon carrying the burden of the offense, he was having to make an additional 12 yards on every play from scrimmage. When you have a bobble or a fumble in the backfield that is another 10 to 15 yards lost. I think Milford's coach had fell in love with everything TaRon to the detriment of the offense overall. I saw the same thing last year at the semifinal game between Strawn and Milford. Milford beat 99% of everybody they played because they could out score them but an average defense with a limited offensive scheme doomed them at Jerry's World.All about the truth":c9d2357u said:I will take the McLean football team. Over Milford. It takes a team to win not one kid.
Texlonghorn75":18nq4mtk said:True. McLean had the better team. McLean's defensive discipline allowed them to slow down TaRon's shake and bake scrambles. McLean scheme allowed them to be where they were needed all game long. TaRon broke some good runs but even TaRon can't do it all. He needed more help. Like a few timely blocks and a better offensive philosophy. Did you notice that on Milburn's spread set Taron was about 12 yards BEHIND the line of scrimmage on most offensive sets. So not only was TaRon carrying the burden of the offense, he was having to make an additional 12 yards on every play from scrimmage. When you have a bobble or a fumble in the backfield that is another 10 to 15 yards lost. I think Milford's coach had fell in love with everything TaRon to the detriment of the offense overall. I saw the same thing last year at the semifinal game between Strawn and Milford. Milford beat 99% of everybody they played because they could out score them but an average defense with a limited offensive scheme doomed them at Jerry's World.All about the truth":18nq4mtk said:I will take the McLean football team. Over Milford. It takes a team to win not one kid.