smokeyjoe53
Six-man pro
Yeah , y’all don’t use many commas or periods up in the frozen north............. at least when speaking..........
topher80":l68lrqo7 said:what is the local health unit doing to help addicts get off meth?
topher80":1c7neo7z said:Holy moly, that is really scary. Meth is that big of a problem in the great Republic of Texas? I don't blame you guys for wanting to keep those tweaked out nutters off your property... what is the local health unit doing to help addicts get off meth?
topher80":hx2lzqj4 said:The wording in the constitution presents a whole heap of problems in itself...
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
I read that as it is a militia, such as the modern day National Guard, who should be armed and willing to defend against governmental tyranny. Naturally, the wording can be read and interpreted a number of ways to support one's point of view/beliefs.
I pray for the senseless killing of innocent citizens to end.
Old Bearkat":3vzq6kky said:Same tired old misleading argument Topher.
As defined by congress in 1789, and earlier defined by Jefferson and Madison, the militia meant the unorganized militia, which means ALL adult males between ages 17 to 64. Don't yap about things you do not understand.
No one likes the slaughter, but the proposed solutions by all you gun control nuts will accomplish nothing but the disarming of law abiding citizens. I oppose all those measures. Also, you keep coming back and saying we need just one more little ban, and all will be fine until you have all guns banned. You Canadians and Brits may want to be unarmed sheeple, but not most Americans.
topher80":2c447oxk said:Old Bearkat":2c447oxk said:Same tired old misleading argument Topher.
As defined by congress in 1789, and earlier defined by Jefferson and Madison, the militia meant the unorganized militia, which means ALL adult males between ages 17 to 64. Don't yap about things you do not understand.
No one likes the slaughter, but the proposed solutions by all you gun control nuts will accomplish nothing but the disarming of law abiding citizens. I oppose all those measures. Also, you keep coming back and saying we need just one more little ban, and all will be fine until you have all guns banned. You Canadians and Brits may want to be unarmed sheeple, but not most Americans.
I said nothing of the sort. I could care less what America does with their laws. Not my country. I came here to better understand the thinking behind keeping the 2nd Amendment not protest as some anti-gun nut. I appreciate you explaining the militia part being unorganized however there was no need for your last paragraph. If a person doesn't ask questions how can they ever understand different points of view?
oldfat&bald":13eghnfc said:Topher, as often as those of us who support the civil rights enshrined in the second amendment have been called terrorists, racists, and murderers here lately, it’s pretty easy to get touchy.
No training unless we consider practicing "lockdown" procedure and thats done maybe every 6 weeks or so51eleven":oiskv356 said:Mark F, as you started this thread I'm wondering if you received the same school active shooter training I did (a while after Virginia Tech in my case). An e-mail and a laminated credit card sized card with the three key points on it. One is run. If you can't be seen by the shooter get away. Two was hide (where in most cases?). Three is fight back if no other choice. Yell angrily at the shooter (???), throw something (a stapler?) at them. I read an article last week that challenged the latter two ideas. It referred to a study by I forget who, maybe the FBI, that active shooters in these cases have a 6 or maybe it was a 9% kill rate on moving targets. If you hide behind a desk your a stationary target to be walked up on. If you yell or throw something you draw attention to yourself as a target. So it concluded, run, in all cases it concluded for a better chance of survival. On a college campus you have the option of legally defending yourself.
That brings up another problem though. This guy did the right thing. When told to throw the gun down, he bent over to lay it down so it wouldn't go off accidentally. He didn't raise it or point it, nothing threatening in any way. But He got shot.
https://lawandcrime.com/crazy/the-good- ... -disarmed-
church-gunman/
51eleven":2evb7ec4 said:Is meat from a hog shot with a blessed gun thus kosher for those of the Jewish faith to eat or must the bullets themselves be blessed with holy water too?
Meth sprayed on weed? Dang,wonder which way that would make you go,Weed,let's eat,let's lay around and get lazy,sleepy,Meth let's go nuts,let's go scrub the tile floors n our bathrooms with a toothbrush,let's stay awake for days,crazy to think of the two mixing,one laid back,one up for days,,I saw this on cops loltopher80":2fysuo21 said:Meth exists here and it mostly sprayed onto marijuana but it is not a problem locally *yet*. The big one that is killing many Torontoians is fake Fentanyl patches which come into Canada from illegal Chinese chemistry factories through the port of Vancouver. No one can tell the difference until they are dead due to the chemical formula being slightly off and way too strong. The ads on the radio explaining the dangers of Fentanyl can be 10,000x stronger than morphine which is bananas. Anyone who has had a serious injury or surgery knows morphine is strong as heck.