Zephyr has had 1-2 starters out with injuries for 4 of there 7 games including starting QB's for 4 games and still won and the coach, to his credit, has pulled the starters later in the games and given the other players some game experience and has not made 45'ing people a priority as some teams do. So if 45'ing teams is what makes the difference in rankings, then I now understand the logic or system, just don't sell Zephyr short. When the playoffs start they will have every player on the team with game experience and they have plenty of depth to bring most any of them in a game when needed. Most every player has had significant minutes in all of the games and yes, if the coach had left the starters in the entire game, then based on your system, Zephyr would be higher in the rankings. But major credit to the Zephyr coaches for understanding that late in the year depth and experience will make a difference and major credit to the players for learning a new system under new coaches and executing that system on the field. I understand your rankings now much better and there are a lot of intangibles that you don't have access to.