Starting with a positive--not a liberal? Excellent! Didn't really think that, but I wanted to see what I was dealing with. Had you proudly said yes, I would have knew I was wasting my time.
Bullet 4, sitting out subs to pad starter stats. Did it happen or not? I don't know, but would love to see your reference's to make this claim. Furthermore, I would like to see it fairly compared to other top notch teams of recent years. That would be fair and unbiased. Just throwing that out about GC, IMO, is indeed targeting. I do know that GC has won a very high % of games at the 7th, 8th, and JV levels for several years now. So I would speculate they are being prepared to progress each year. As far as subs at the varsity level, again, I do not know. I believe that may be a coaches decision. Have your starters jump on them early and rotate subs after that, or get your starters as much time as possible to prepare for the playoffs. Regardless, have you made this claim about anyone else?
I'm not a GC fan. I have no ties at all. I do however have tons of respect for the Program, school, and community. It is a good one and I believe you are out of line with some of this. But I could care less if they have a winning season, or make the playoffs. This is a fact!
I do think you are smart if that makes you feel better, but I don't think you are right with your every word. But yes it was snide, sorry it was so weak.
As far as my whole little speech thing, I expressed myself, sarcastically, write or wrong. I am not looking for your approval at all. But I would suggest you go back and read many of your numerous novels you have posted. You are not the final word.
Honestly, I do not think you have a personal agenda. But I have yet to figure out why this topic is so fascinating to you.
I am giving my opinion here. Not to be childish, but I will not respond after this. We are wasting our time. I cant stand people that single others out with a negative posts? You can spin this all you want, but it clearly says just how bad could it be? OOOOOOps #1, oopps #2, may end up 4-6, subs sit bench while starters padded stats. How does one perceive this as anything but being negative and a little gleeful. There is more JO but I'm not going back thru it, you and I are just going to disagree here.