Goob's newfangled rankin machine

[rainjacktx]

Oh C'mon guys.
I laughed when I read it and I know it's so not true.
Isn't it more likely
gay porn falls under the
"Jack"
of all trades responsibilities?

Just wondering - when did gay porn become a responsibility?

 

[smokeyjoe53]

Oh C'mon guys.
I laughed when I read it and I know it's so not true.
Isn't it more likely
gay porn falls under the
"Jack"
of all trades responsibilities?

Just wondering - when did gay porn become a responsibility?

Beats me. Evidently you're an authority on the subject, why don't you tell us?

 

[A_Whippersnapper]

You are right doggy, I should know that rainjack is not homophobic................

I abhor the use of the term “homophobic”, when what is meant is “homoantagonistic”. I know few, if any, straight men who “fear” homosexuals, even if they were being “hit on”... the reaction could range from a response of “Nah, man... I’m straight.” to something more aggressive. The more secure a person is in his own sexuality, the less likely he is apt to present hostility toward something in not in keeping with that self-concept.

Homoantagonists tend to be very insecure in their own heterosexuality, and feel the need to “prove” it by making insults, when in reality, all that is done by that hostility, is proof of their own insecurity.

This is especially true of people (particularly men) involved in activities which have, stereotypically, been largely populated by the gay community, e.g. musical theatre, interior decorators, and bodybuilders.

 

[rainjacktx]

Oh C'mon guys.
I laughed when I read it and I know it's so not true.
Isn't it more likely
gay porn falls under the
"Jack"
of all trades responsibilities?

Just wondering - when did gay porn become a responsibility?

Beats me. Evidently you're an authority on the subject, why don't you tell us?

The use of a term automatically confers authority status on the user?

 

[rainjacktx]

You are right doggy, I should know that rainjack is not homophobic................

I abhor the use of the term “homophobic”, when what is meant is “homoantagonistic”. I know few, if any, straight men who “fear” homosexuals, even if they were being “hit on”... the reaction could range from a response of “Nah, man... I’m straight.” to something more aggressive. The more secure a person is in his own sexuality, the less likely he is apt to present hostility toward something in not in keeping with that self-concept.

Homoantagonists tend to be very insecure in their own heterosexuality, and feel the need to “prove” it by making insults, when in reality, all that is done by that hostility, is proof of their own insecurity.

This is especially true of people (particularly men) involved in activities which have, stereotypically, been largely populated by the gay community, e.g. musical theatre, interior decorators, and bodybuilders.

LOL. It. Was. A. Joke.

 

[CowboyP]

LOL. It. Was. A. Joke.

Your "joke" is more likely a subconscious statement of desire.

 

[rainjacktx]

LOL. It. Was. A. Joke.

Your "joke" is more likely a subconscious statement of desire.

One small correction: My jokes tend to send people over the edge and into fits of complete ignorance.

 

[CowboyP]

LOL. It. Was. A. Joke.

Your "joke" is more likely a subconscious statement of desire.

One small correction: My jokes tend to send people over the edge and into fits of complete ignorance.

I believe you are confused. You are prone to fits of ignorance. Most of us are simply attempting to prevent you from making a fool of yourself. We are rarely successful, yet we continue to try.

 

[A_Whippersnapper]

LOL. It. Was. A. Joke.

Your "joke" is more likely a subconscious statement of desire.

One small correction: My jokes tend to send people over the edge and into fits of complete ignorance.

Your “joke” was an attack on a young man who is not present on this board to defend his reputation, if he were inclined to give your mental flatulence any thought at all. An unprovoked attack, even masked as a feeble attempt at humour, upon someone unable to respond is an act of abject cowardice, and the manner of the attack, the use of homoantagonistic innuendo, leaves one wont to wonder the basis of the attack.

 

[Dogface]

Uhhh...

OK, so...
how bout them Cowboys??

 

[oldfat&bald]

I think someone should give ArrogancePersonified a little credit. Although the joke was offensive and not very funny, it was an attempt at humor. Given the limited intellect he possess and his personality, which can piss off a fence post, I'm kinda proud he sees the need for behavior modification and is trying.

 

[rainjacktx]

LOL. It. Was. A. Joke.

Your "joke" is more likely a subconscious statement of desire.

One small correction: My jokes tend to send people over the edge and into fits of complete ignorance.

Your “joke” was an attack on a young man who is not present on this board to defend his reputation, if he were inclined to give your mental flatulence any thought at all. An unprovoked attack, even masked as a feeble attempt at humour, upon someone unable to respond is an act of abject cowardice, and the manner of the attack, the use of homoantagonistic innuendo, leaves one wont to wonder the basis of the attack.

If you don't like what I write - don't read it. But please stop with the made-up words and character judgements.

So an unprovoked attack on someone who can defend himself is okay in your book? Stop trying to invent words, and concentrate on your logic. It is deplorable.

 

[rainjacktx]

I think someone should give ArrogancePersonified a little credit. Although the joke was offensive and not very funny, it was an attempt at humor. Given the limited intellect he possess and his personality, which can piss off a fence post, I'm kinda proud he sees the need for behavior modification and is trying.

Sadly, fence posts are an intellectual step up from the regulars around here.

What kind of wine matches up well with fence posts? Maybe the wine freak will enlighten me after he's through making up Politically Correct labels for a bad joke.

 

[A_Whippersnapper]

If you don't like what I write - don't read it. But please stop with the made-up words and character judgements.

Nice bit of petulance, right there. Will you take your ball and go home, now?

Words have meanings, and the word “homophobic” is one of the most misused and overused words in today’s common parlance, so my “made-up word” is an effort to more accurately describe the true attitude and motivation in the use of the playground taunts and accusations.

“Made-up words” are, in fact, commonplace... fifteen years hence would you have known what was meant if someone googled you? Fascism entered the English language in the early 1920s, totalitarianism in the mid-1920s. Semantics clarify, and crystallise thought; proper use of the appropriate, and most accurate word or phrase remove ambiguity.

So an unprovoked attack on someone who can defend himself is okay in your book? Stop trying to invent words, and concentrate on your logic. It is deplorable.

“In my book” it is certainly not an act of cowardice to defend someone, not present, from the attacks of someone who purports to be the intellectual superior of all on the board.

I have addressed the “invented” word(s) and view your quia dicere, ita est argument as fallacious and moot.

 

[Jedi]

Wow!! That is some good stuff.

 

[coachbill]

where's goob when you need him?

 

[fajitapete]

...
I have addressed the “invented” word(s) and view your quia dicere, ita est argument as fallacious and moot. [/size][/color]

If only he was mute

 

[51eleven]

Sadly, fence posts are an intellectual step up from the regulars around here.

Take a look in the mirror, your a regular round here.

 

[Dogface]

Most days
I can only hope
to have the sense of a fencepost.

 

[51eleven]

Whut iz wrong with yew?

There is no excuse for such a taseless comment. I't might be a joke in the lockeroom between players that jack with each other but not on here. In this case maybe it's jealousy. RJ said before he did stat's for Valley for X years. Correct me if I'm wrong, this is just from memory of what I read as I wasn't there but the 04 state game, Valley's 1st, featured a Freshman TE for RS that led his team in beating Valley. Maybe it's that ring (and his other 2) compared to their 0.
Some of us old farts get on here and banter, tease, and insult each other. Making such an inference about a young man who never posts here anymore and trying to call it a bad joke is about as uncouth as it get's.
He said his daughter was HC Queen, usually a popularity contest. Makes one wonder if he's the real daddy. Did the other kid's feel sorry for her beacuse they think he's her dad? Is he wanting us to make speculative jokes or comments about her?
Others have twisted his name on here around before. I think he deserves a new name, a whole new word. How about "his analness"?