Shad Kline
Six-man fan
I think you missed my point by 180 degrees. I'm saying that a soft schedule doesn't make you not as good. Not that Steele wasn't good.
Again, 1996 RS was ONE of the TEN games that Sidney played. I don't think playing one "better than their record shows" team, invalidates my point. But I'll concede. Steele played a tough schedule, and had great numbers, therefore great qb. (I always thought he was a great qb, but playing a soft schedule, according to some, invalidates that. In other words, I don't think that, (what was it? 6?) only 6 quality teams out of ten games should be counted towards his stats. I think the other 4 games should count just as much.)
Speaking of soft schedules:
2007 RS, So that must invalidate TE's accomplishments.
2012 RS, soft schedule, sorry Chance.
2009 RS, could it be any softer? guess the coaches kid wasn't so great afterall.
Note: Normally, I wouldn't post this note, but since I don't actually believe that a soft schedule makes you less of an athlete, you play who you play, you do what you do. I just don't want the rabid RS fans thinking I'm actually degrading them. Just showing that some of the greatest players, who have great numbers, didn't always come from the teams with the toughest schedules.
Should JJ Watts have to put an asterisk by his 20 1/2 sacks because they played Tennessee and Jacksonville twice each this year? Or is his 20 1/2 sacks still impressive?
Again, 1996 RS was ONE of the TEN games that Sidney played. I don't think playing one "better than their record shows" team, invalidates my point. But I'll concede. Steele played a tough schedule, and had great numbers, therefore great qb. (I always thought he was a great qb, but playing a soft schedule, according to some, invalidates that. In other words, I don't think that, (what was it? 6?) only 6 quality teams out of ten games should be counted towards his stats. I think the other 4 games should count just as much.)
Speaking of soft schedules:
2007 RS, So that must invalidate TE's accomplishments.
2012 RS, soft schedule, sorry Chance.
2009 RS, could it be any softer? guess the coaches kid wasn't so great afterall.
Note: Normally, I wouldn't post this note, but since I don't actually believe that a soft schedule makes you less of an athlete, you play who you play, you do what you do. I just don't want the rabid RS fans thinking I'm actually degrading them. Just showing that some of the greatest players, who have great numbers, didn't always come from the teams with the toughest schedules.
Should JJ Watts have to put an asterisk by his 20 1/2 sacks because they played Tennessee and Jacksonville twice each this year? Or is his 20 1/2 sacks still impressive?