txcoachttu
Six-man fan
BE":15fl4kxe said:Mister, If the truth were known I'm probably skewed in more places than just my assumptions.
Well then, no more half measures. You got me fired up, boy!! "Let's damn the torpedoes and full steam ahead" all year and get after these big boys ...football too. Come on King Kong, why play 6 on 6 all summer when by adding just one single kid we can challenge Munday and Canadian in the statewide 7 on 7 league. In roundball all you beasts step up like Paducah and Nazareth and play up with the likes of Smyer and Munday. Lets get in there with the baseball and softballers and test our metal with Clarendon, Gruver and soon to be Canadian Wildcats.
We can beat lots of them. We will be competitive, but the average small school will find it tough against the average bigger school. How many more will choose to compete in Class A the next cycle? Looks like there are a couple dozen more schools that are on the bubble. Move them all to Class A ?
I want more than just six or eight small school teams year in and year out to have a taste of glory in athletics. I hope we can continue to find a way to spread just a tiny bit of success to fifteen or twenty or even twenty-five schools. That is the entire purpose for having more than one division.
Let these eleven-man schools take care of themselves, play AA across the board, or talk the UIL into a Division ll track. Who says we all have to crowd into the same stadium two weeks after the Regional Meets. It would take a half ounce of imagination and "3.14 meters" of vision to form a better plan.
It really never was a honeymoon, more like an affair, which never last. ):
"If you don't have the skills there's always eleven-man"
6man football has 2 champions. The 1A basketball champion was a non football school (what classification would you want them to play) and the track champion was a 6man school. I'm not real sure exactly what you think would change. What number do you want the cutoff to be or is it if you don't choose to play 6man then every other sports is at a disadvantage? They are already at a numbers disadvantage in football, they are no different from everyone else in the other sports. Munday was the biggest school in 1A and they didn't bring home either state track championship. No offense to their kids or coaches because they competed well. As far as basketball goes, they also played 1A this year. Were in the district with crowell. I don't think people choose to go 1A, the numbers are the numbers. As far as baseball/softball goes there is a legit argument. Borden lost to Hawley over the weekend. That is a big numbers disadvantage. Those two sports are what need to be addressed by the UIL. This thought of sharing the success. I don't think you could talk any coach in any sport to sharing their success. Pretty sure Richland Springs was just fine being dominant in football. Mike Reed has never came across the sidelines to us and told us we could go ahead and win this game because they've had enough success, they would like to share. Crowell won it back to back, doesn't seem right. They should of had to play up after winning the first and returning most of their kids. Btw, those kids probably could have won some at the 11man level.