I think you are right as well... I think there would be some 11man teams that would have a higher percentage when going for two that would justify them going for 2.... but I would think those offenses would be the ones that would probably never have the need to go for 2. While conversely, the ones that would need to on a regular basis probably wouldn't have a very high percentage. It is just the risk of the whole thing.... It is an easy thing for a spectator to point to if the coach goes for two and misses. Kicking is usually a much safer bet.... hence why it is safer in 6man to go for two each time.... My take on it is this.... In sixman, you find a kid that can one step punch it through the uprights and go for two each time. In 11man, you go for two when the game dictates going for two. I personally like to take the points I have until late in the game... over the course of a game, you never know what may happen.... so going for two and missing early may put you in jeopardy later in the game. Since in 6man, you kick for two, it is generally much safer going for two each time.