I wouldn't be against if a team is down by 45 at half then they get two possessions to try and close that lead if they fail then games is over, now if the teams is down my 45 plus two scores or more at half I would say stick to regular rules or just shorten the time on the game, that's about all...
2010 Canam bowl we had a kicker from Gordon who ended up playing a Sul Ross he hit a 34-36 yarder in our game that helped us win think we won that game by 5.
Isn't that how it always will be? Before Rigdon is was about RS recruiting it's always going to be a thing. But I'm sure RS isn't the only one they just got away with it the longest sounds like we are about to have a 2.0 version.
I just don’t understand how this school could suck so bad then turn it around year after year in the 2000’s. But yet there are always new faces team is always stacked. Plus they play in a weak area kinda reminds me of Jayton only thing that divides the two is bring in players. RS is a proven...
D2 you have a point Strawn is the favorite Iredell is the only other possible choice. But you never know I didn't think Crowell would beat BC in 2015. Then to turn around and lose to Abbott so it could happen.
D1 I like Mcleans chances but they will have to go through BC and you can't count...