freeagent
Six-man pro
Realignment is not yet released.
http://tapps.net/athletics/tournament-brackets/
My only complaint ... why is it that District 4 & 5, the two largest districts in the Division II classification, have their champions playing in the second round? I'd have to check my math again (especially since each team has a team not playing this season), but close to HALF of the Division II teams are in those two districts.
We have a two-team district, where I understand both are expected to be placed in the playoffs, and my call would have been to have their champion play another district in the second round.
It seems every year when we have five districts the decision is to have Dist 1/Dist 2 play in the second round one year and Dist 4/Dist 5 play in the second round the other year. Dist 3 never seems to get into that mix; and on top of that, Dist 3 happens to be the two-team district in 2013!
Otherwise, I can live with them ...
http://tapps.net/athletics/tournament-brackets/
My only complaint ... why is it that District 4 & 5, the two largest districts in the Division II classification, have their champions playing in the second round? I'd have to check my math again (especially since each team has a team not playing this season), but close to HALF of the Division II teams are in those two districts.
We have a two-team district, where I understand both are expected to be placed in the playoffs, and my call would have been to have their champion play another district in the second round.
It seems every year when we have five districts the decision is to have Dist 1/Dist 2 play in the second round one year and Dist 4/Dist 5 play in the second round the other year. Dist 3 never seems to get into that mix; and on top of that, Dist 3 happens to be the two-team district in 2013!
Otherwise, I can live with them ...