You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Seriously...
- Thread starter WarEagle
- Start date
Yeah 71-26.... but lets look at what happened... 20-8 HT in the 1st qtr. Then 5 starters get hurt and can't return because of blatant intent to injure kids by summit. HT finished the game with 7 kids 4 freshmen became starters because 5 starters on both sides were taken out intentionally. Summit could not catch #10 for HT until he was intentionally targeted and taken out of the game. Don't come on here spouting off the score without sharing the truth. HT was destroying Summit in fact their 1st 2 touchdowns came in less than a minute of each other and were up 12-0 in no time at all. Had those 5 kids not been targeted and taken out, it would have been over at halftime in favor of HT. Yes your team won, yes your team had 0 injured kids, yes your team made some very good catches and throws, but it was not on the starters. When your 6'1 receiver is matched up with a barely 5' freshman I'd expect the 6'1 kid to make plays. I will not let you come on here and boast about what happened, when the TRUTH is had 5 starters not been taken out, the game ends at halftime with HT blowing out summit!!!
DirtyBayBulldog
11-man fan
Warcat82":19aod9tm said:Yeah 71-26.... but lets look at what happened... 20-8 HT in the 1st qtr. Then 5 starters get hurt and can't return because of blatant intent to injure kids by summit. HT finished the game with 7 kids 4 freshmen became starters because 5 starters on both sides were taken out intentionally. Summit could not catch #10 for HT until he was intentionally targeted and taken out of the game. Don't come on here spouting off the score without sharing the truth. HT was destroying Summit in fact their 1st 2 touchdowns came in less than a minute of each other and were up 12-0 in no time at all. Had those 5 kids not been targeted and taken out, it would have been over at halftime in favor of HT. Yes your team won, yes your team had 0 injured kids, yes your team made some very good catches and throws, but it was not on the starters. When your 6'1 receiver is matched up with a barely 5' freshman I'd expect the 6'1 kid to make plays. I will not let you come on here and boast about what happened, when the TRUTH is had 5 starters not been taken out, the game ends at halftime with HT blowing out summit!!!
What are the health status of the kids that were targeted?
Again the comment about targeting by Eagle players is absurd. In fact upon review of the game film the most flagrant play occurred when a HT player power drove an Eagle player into the ground while out of bounds. So I would appreciate it if the targeting comments ceased as they are completely false!!
-War Eagle!!
-War Eagle!!
Cougar1414
Six-man fan
A lot of things sometimes are not captured on game film. That many injuries is high in a game. Hopefully those young men are back soon.
Cougar1414":3shhk9wn said:A lot of things sometimes are not captured on game film. That many injuries is high in a game. Hopefully those young men are back soon.
Oh it's all on film too... and 3 could be done for the year. They even kicked one of the kids in the head then stood over him talking mess... got it all on camera...
Cougar1414
Six-man fan
Thats unfortunate, was it cracks below the waist? Praying for the injured players.
Not sure what the confusion is. Hard crack (illegal) from Temple, but the rule has changed this year so little different. Lost one to targeting, and temple had 3-4 injuries after the first quarter. They were dominating summit then the wheels fell off. When you lose 4-5 starters it’s hard to keep the truck on the road. Summit took over, end of story. If Temple is full strength like the first quarter then it’s over by half or 3rd at the latest. Game over...evidently the spread was correct.
Old76er":oa8ibyuv said:Not sure what the confusion is. Hard crack (illegal) from Temple, but the rule has changed this year so little different. Lost one to targeting, and temple had 3-4 injuries after the first quarter. They were dominating summit then the wheels fell off. When you lose 4-5 starters it’s hard to keep the truck on the road. Summit took over, end of story. If Temple is full strength like the first quarter then it’s over by half or 3rd at the latest. Game over...evidently the spread was correct.
Thank you
Cougar1414":2u2b8c8r said:Thats unfortunate, was it cracks below the waist? Praying for the injured players.
One was a high low that the refs missed. Not their fault for missing it. One that could need surgery was a defensive player cutting the center to prevent him from blocking the blitzing linebacker...
Cougar1414
Six-man fan
War Eagle said their was a new coach hopefully he is not ok with this style of play.
DirtyBayBulldog
11-man fan
If true that Temple was putting the hurt on Cedar Park like you say and the major shift in momentum is questionable actions leading to multiple injuries, then that is a shame and setting your team up to have some major heat brought to you.
Would love the input of some objective views as the two main voices are team homers.
Would love the input of some objective views as the two main voices are team homers.
Cut blocked yes but a defensive player taking out the knee of the center to prevent him from blocking the blitzer is not 6 man football, that is dirty.Old76er":2srsl1k3 said:I’m gonna throw it out there that the hard hit was maybe a transfer. If so they have and excuse. Six man you are going to get cutblocked or cracked. Welcome to “not 11 man football”. Refs control it to an extent
DirtyBayBulldog":28oa7grr said:If true that Temple was putting the hurt on Cedar Park like you say and the major shift in momentum is questionable actions leading to multiple injuries, then that is a shame and setting your team up to have some major heat brought to you.
Would love the input of some objective views as the two main voices are team homers.
I got the game film to prove it. 4:15 left in 1st qtr and it was 20-8 HT. Then 3 of the 5 injuries happen within minutes of each other. Then all the sudden Summit was able to score and move the ball. The other 2 injuries happened before half...
DirtyBayBulldog
11-man fan
Warcat82":10xhrkwu said:Cut blocked yes but a defensive player taking out the knee of the center to prevent him from blocking the blitzer is not 6 man football, that is dirty.Old76er":10xhrkwu said:I’m gonna throw it out there that the hard hit was maybe a transfer. If so they have and excuse. Six man you are going to get cutblocked or cracked. Welcome to “not 11 man football”. Refs control it to an extent
I'm not educated in the culture if 6man football but I see nothing wrong with a defender going low on an incoming blocker. An offensive blocker can go low on a defender, i see nothing wrong with it being legal for the defender.
Anything else questionable that has happened?
DirtyBayBulldog":1j6a93ky said:Warcat82":1j6a93ky said:Cut blocked yes but a defensive player taking out the knee of the center to prevent him from blocking the blitzer is not 6 man football, that is dirty.Old76er":1j6a93ky said:I’m gonna throw it out there that the hard hit was maybe a transfer. If so they have and excuse. Six man you are going to get cutblocked or cracked. Welcome to “not 11 man football”. Refs control it to an extent
How about a kid punting another kid in the head on the sideline after the tackle and standing over him talking mess?
I'm not educated in the culture if 6man football but I see nothing wrong with a defender going low on an incoming blocker. An offensive blocker can go low on a defender, i see nothing wrong with it being legal for the defender.
Anything else questionable that has happened?
Similar threads
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 4K