Wins Tree -- something to play with

[Shad Kline]

Interesting, pablum for the proponents that if their team beat a team that is ranked higher then their team, then their team HAS to be ranked higher.

Interesting, but I'm more interested in the method you use to walk the tree, recursive call or a aggregation of down stream victories? How hard would it be to do the inverse, ie, losses

No one is making that argument, Pete. No one.

Ummmmm, you did. On my post, not even a week ago. Just sayin.

 

[CowboyP]

Hornkeeper, isn't it past your bedtime? Or is mommy letting you stay up late?

 

[Shad Kline]

Hornkeeper, isn't it past your bedtime? Or is mommy letting you stay up late?

Bed is not a luxury that I have gotten to take advantage of yet this weekend.

Stay on topic! No hijacking! Focus man, FOCUS!

Trees!!!

 

[CowboyP]

Hornkeeper, isn't it past your bedtime? Or is mommy letting you stay up late?

Bed is not a luxury that I have gotten to take advantage of yet this weekend.

Stay on topic! No hijacking! Focus man, FOCUS!

Trees!!!

I thought it was wins.

 

[granger]

I have actually fixed this, I think... It always had the correct teams, it just labeled them wrong.... The system is approaching almost 10000 connected pairs of teams connected to each other.

 

[rainjacktx]

Interesting, pablum for the proponents that if their team beat a team that is ranked higher then their team, then their team HAS to be ranked higher.

Interesting, but I'm more interested in the method you use to walk the tree, recursive call or a aggregation of down stream victories? How hard would it be to do the inverse, ie, losses

No one is making that argument, Pete. No one.

Ummmmm, you did. On my post, not even a week ago. Just sayin.

Ummmm. No. Not going to make the pointless attempt to go back down that road, but you completely missed what I was trying to say.

Pearls before the proverbial swine. I shan't cast them again.

 

[sinfonian]

I wish they had something like this for 11-man. This is really cool!