Isn't 6Man the one division that should really never move their number up to accommodate schools that just cant cut it in 11 man? Sounds to me like 6man is not the problem... it is the divisions in 11 man. 6 man is created for teams that couldnt field an 11man team. It just seems like this is getting away from the spirit of the game when you allow teams with over 100 students be a part of 6man. I know, I know... I am sure this will cause the discussion of the number of kids that come out and all, and how there could be 90 girls in high school and only 10 boys.... but that is an anomaly... I am speaking to the great majority of schools that have 100 students that SHOULD be able to field an 11 man team. (which I would venture to say is mostly ALL of them)
So, the question is...... what should be the ultimate cut off for schools in 6man? 100?? 150??? 200??? (personally, Id like to see it back in the 80s) To me, it is a number that should not increase just because someone is getting their tail whooped in 11-man. This isn't the reason the game was created. I contend that if this continues, soon you will see not only Varsity and JV teams, but also Freshman teams competing at the 6man level. Was this game for those that could field 2, 3, or 4 teams of 10-15 athletes?? To me, that is just not keeping with the spirit of the game. But I am just an old, idealist and traditionalist. I love this game for what it is, and for what it is intended.