Blum Assistant Football/ Basketball/Track

Coach Lewis

11-man fan
We have an opening for an assistant football, basketball, and track coach. Must be Social Studies or History certified.No alternative certification ,please. Must have or be able to get a CDL license by August 3rd. If interested email resume to Jeff Sanders at [email protected] or call 254-874-5231

Thanks,
Reggie Lewis
Blum ISD Boys Athletic Director
 
Why am I seeing this a lot lately? "No alternative certification." I was alternative certification, and it has caused NO problems for my school.
 
Obviously they don't have the guts to give a guy a chance. When I see statements like these I take it as a flaw in their character and I wouldn't want to work there.
 
I was alternative certification also. I think most/some teachers are under the assumption that the traditional approach is the only way. It is the internal motivation and not where the certification came from that matters.
 
This might just get a major blasting from some quarters, but......

Teacher education, especially in the elementary grades is a joke. It was a joke when I was in college over 30 years ago, and it is even more of a joke today. A horribly bad joke. The best thing we could do for American education is to close down ALL of the education schools at ALL colleges and go back to hiring folks who have a BA/BS or better in English, math, history, or science. Can you tell why someone with a degree in engineering or physics is not capable of teaching math or science in high school?

To be even more blunt, a PE major used to be the butt of a lot of jokes back in the day, but a PE major has more academic rigor, with courses in anatomy, kinesthetics, etc, than an education major taking nothing but those idiotic, but ridiculously easy education courses that have all the academic rigor of a Dick and Jane reader.
 
What you say is true, but as I understand some of the certification deals do not leave you highly "qualified". Now a lot of teachers who are teaching now are not truly highly qualified, but that is the rub. But to your comment about teacher shortage. Several years ago TEA decided that they did not want teachers who retired to be able to come back and teach unless the school was penalized. That was smart, cut down on some folks who could have helped. The final solution is to make the teaching profession one which is better paid, better administrated, and supported. That might keep some folks in the profession that are saying the heck with it.
 
Why does an individual even have to be qualified to teach, all they do nowadys is teach the TAKS test, I'm am in agreeance with several people in the sixman community or the state in that matter, ditch teh TAKS test and let a teacher do what she or he was hired to do "TEACH".
As far as the no pass no play rule I agree with that, education comes first and sports second thats why its an extracurricular activity.
 
Cody', you don't know the half of it. Now TEA is pushing a teaching curriculum called CSCOPE that dictates every moment of your lesson. The focus is on hundreds of handouts and day after day of groupwork. Most can't even tell if they are teaching TEKS or something else. In addition, the principals have to do at least twenty "360s" on each teacher per year. A 360 is an observation.

To illustrate how shortsighted some of this is many schools require government and economic teachers to use the curriculum. Ok, so what you say. Those two courses are taught to seniors, and they have already cleared the TAKS testing unless they happened to fail their excet level test. Most juniors pass their excet level social studies Taks test. It is the math and science that is the most difficult. Most seniors simply do not need a special curriculum in Government and Economics. It is wasted money. Our school spent nearly $100,000. on it this past summer. Why? Because one single group of boys failed one single test in junior high. Many of the schools going to it are requiring all their core subject teachers to switch over to it whether they show TAKS need or not. It's the equivalent of forcing a coach to change his coaching style and philosophy whether he is successful or not. "Fix it even if it needs no fixing." The inexperienced administrators are jumping on the CSCOPE bandwagon like rats on a cheese-trap.

I feel better now that I got that off my chest. :oops:
 
Since everyone is on their soapboxes now, I'll drag mine from the corner and start ranting.

The education schools are a big joke, even 30 years ago when I was in college at UT, the curriculum of the education school was famed for it's ease and lack of rigourous scholarship. The textbooks were full of half baked theories and semantically null buzzwords based in interpretations of brain research by people who had absolutely no scientific background, but had a political axe to grind. All in the name of equality of results, not opportunity. A little research showed me it all went back to John Dewey and his Marxist ideological background. Dewey and his acolytes slowly took control of the education schools and have ruined our nation's primary education system.

It used to be that anyone with a BA/BS degree could teach in a school, but the Deweyistas took control of the federal education bureaucracy early on in the Roosevelt administration and forced the credential system on everyone as the Federal government slowly took control of local school systems over the next 20 years. You had to have a certificate from an accredited education school to be able to teach, and they controlled the schools. The last step to this came about as a result of the Sputnik scare in 1957. The Marxists never let a good crisis go to waste. In the name of "catching up to the Soviets, they threw "free" federal money at all schools, but had majr strings attached to the cash, the biggest of which was surrendering local control to the state and federal bureaucracies.

At first interference was minimal, but as school districts became dependent upon the largess of the state and federal governments, the strings were drawn tighter. marxist lawyer groups set up strawmen using "poor" school districts to demand not just equality of federal and state funding, but total equality of ALL funding. Sympathetic judges who would interpret laws concerning government funding equality stretched this to all funding. Other legal groups got rights never meant for minors extended to undermine teacher/administrator discipline, especially in high schools where teenagers need very strict guidance to get past the pitfalls that the sudden hormone influx creates in teens. Then in the name of equality, the brightest students are shortchanged and in some cases pushed down. Most funding was aimed at those whose contributions to society will be minimal. Effective teaching methods, especially for math are abandoned, given names like "drill and kill" and "rote memorization", and given upin the name of "creative thinking", etc.

If we want to make the schools better, give up all federal funding, abandon the education schools, and let the local parents get back in control.

/rant
 
just throwing this out there but i do not like the fact that inorder to coach now you need to also teach a subject. my passion is coachin and teaching football shouldnt that be enough?
i am not an in the classroom type of person
plus being told what i have to teach is somthing im not too fond of. sure there is teaching p.e but ive found that the ones who get that job latch on to it and usually dont let go there are plenty of p.e coaches out there. then there is a possible ad job but those chances rarely pop up for young head coaches
the result is coaches who arnt passionate about in classroom teaching which can sometimes lead to the students not getting the full experience because the coach is only teaching that subj because its the only way that they can do what they are really passionate about.
so back to the point let coaches coach and teachers teach.
 
You need to get you a coaching job as a head guy at a 4 or 5 A and then you will not have to teach. Otherwise, except in rare, rare, rare situations you are going to have to work in the classroom and do a good job at it. I would wager that the best coaches in sixman are great teachers, you have to be to be a good coach.

Just one person's take on that.
 
High Plains Drifter":1i891hx3 said:
You need to get you a coaching job as a head guy at a 4 or 5 A and then you will not have to teach. Otherwise, except in rare, rare, rare situations you are going to have to work in the classroom and do a good job at it. I would wager that the best coaches in sixman are great teachers, you have to be to be a good coach.

Just one person's take on that.

One of the two best teachers I had in HS was a coach.
 
Back
Top