Home
Teams
Divisions
Rankings
Overall / Uber
Scores
Needed
Archive
Highest scoring games
Lowest scoring games
Schedules
Weekly map
Open teams
Spreads
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Talking Six-Man Football
Six-Man Football Talk
Rankings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coby12@LucasChristian" data-source="post: 268245" data-attributes="member: 26501"><p>How do you explain Coram Deo, They run a heavy run game. To say that TAPPS only does spread formations and hardly runs tight is ridiculous. I have played six man football for 6 years and I can say without a doubt that they have the physicality and toughness to compete in TAPPS. Mitchell Crow for Lakehill is an excellent example. You can't just say that TAPPS is inconsistent when they are playing games against UIL and are putting up points and keeping up. The only thing distinguishing UIL from TAPPS is that they are bigger schools.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coby12@LucasChristian, post: 268245, member: 26501"] How do you explain Coram Deo, They run a heavy run game. To say that TAPPS only does spread formations and hardly runs tight is ridiculous. I have played six man football for 6 years and I can say without a doubt that they have the physicality and toughness to compete in TAPPS. Mitchell Crow for Lakehill is an excellent example. You can't just say that TAPPS is inconsistent when they are playing games against UIL and are putting up points and keeping up. The only thing distinguishing UIL from TAPPS is that they are bigger schools. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Talking Six-Man Football
Six-Man Football Talk
Rankings
Top
