Hornkeeper's rankings for week 7, Top 100

Shad Kline

Six-man fan
Overall Division School Rating
1 1 Richland Springs 247.23
2 1 Ira 245.60
3 2 Borden County 233.82
4 3 Petersburg 233.01
5 4 Water Valley 232.82
6 1 Bulverde Bracken Christian 231.98
7 5 Rankin 226.82
8 2 Austin Hill Country 225.82
9 6 Throckmorton 222.88
10 7 Valley 219.35
11 8 Garden City 217.82
12 9 Follett 210.98
13 2 Jonesboro 209.98
14 3 Newcastle 206.48
15 4 Sterling City 205.54
16 10 Ropes 203.79
17 5 Milford 201.82
18 11 Spur 200.60
19 12 Aquilla 200.44
20 1 Waco Live Oak 199.94
21 3 Dallas The Covenant 199.88
22 13 Meadow 197.10
23 14 Aspermont 196.23
24 15 Crowell 196.01
25 16 Sands 194.35
26 17 Fort Davis 193.87
27 4 Abilene Christian 192.73
28 6 Calvert 191.94
29 5 Kerrville Our Lady of the Hills 191.47
30 6 Temple Holy Trinity Catholic 191.03
31 18 Rochelle 189.97
32 19 O'Donnell 183.73
33 7 Tomball Rosehill 183.49
34 1 Fredericksburg Heritage 182.73
35 20 Abbott 180.82
36 2 Tomball Christian Homeschool 180.72
37 1 Lucas Christian 178.48
38 2 Azle Christian 177.99
39 21 May 176.76
40 22 Zephyr 176.72
41 Fort Hancock 175.73
42 23 Penelope 174.99
43 24 Bynum 174.88
44 3 Midland Trinity 173.65
45 7 Grandfalls-Royalty 172.46
46 4 Arlington St. Paul Prep 171.73
47 8 Motley County 171.51
48 2 Dickinson Pine Drive 170.65
49 3 Boerne Geneva 170.56
50 9 Miami 167.23
51 10 Bryson 165.57
52 11 Whitharral 165.27
53 12 Balmorhea 163.55
54 13 Amherst 163.51
55 Anton 161.64
56 Houston Emery-Weiner 161.57
57 8 Rockwall Heritage 159.76
58 4 Brownwood Victory Life 159.40
59 5 Alvin Living Stones 158.65
60 25 Knox City 158.35
61 26 Walnut Springs 157.66
62 27 Oakwood 156.93
63 Blum 156.82
64 28 Robert Lee 155.73
65 29 Lometa 155.44
66 30 Gordon 154.79
67 14 Cherokee 153.22
68 31 Paducah 152.73
69 9 EP Jesus Chapel 152.58
70 6 SA Town East 150.56
71 15 Guthrie 150.12
72 7 WF Notre Dame 149.70
73 8 Heath Fulton 148.31
74 5 Arlington High Point Prep 147.85
75 32 Grady 147.73
76 16 Lefors 147.65
77 33 Klondike 147.60
78 10 Marble Falls Faith 147.46
79 3 San Marcos Homeschool 147.00
80 6 Fort Worth Christian Life 145.73
81 Temple Centex Homeschool 145.66
82 11 Kennedale Fellowship 145.03
83 17 Strawn 144.97
84 18 Iredell 144.88
85 9 Granbury Happy Hill 143.70
86 19 Groom 143.65
87 20 Panther Creek 143.14
88 34 Avalon 141.66
89 4 SA FEAST Homeschool 141.35
90 21 Gustine 141.14
91 22 Loraine 140.53
92 35 Irving Universal Academy 139.72
93 12 Sugar Land Logos Prep 138.49
94 36 Leverett's Chapel 137.38
95 23 Trinidad 136.99
96 13 Watauga Harvest 136.85
97 37 Blanket 135.78
98 5 Bryan Allen Academy 135.72
99 38 Chillicothe 134.88
100 24 Loop 134.53
 
oldfat&bald":1fsbkdfz said:
Now Smokey, I can gripe as good as, if not better than, you. My general gripe is all the people griping.
ofb, you're like an old woman. If you can't gossip about it you gripe about it. Are you related to rainjack?
 
I find interesting the disparity between Throckmorton's relative standing here as opposed to Granger's system where they would be considered the third best team. Any explanation for that?
 
|(My spread - actual score) / 2|

Beat the spread, go up by that much, other team goes down by that much. Cap at 45 on spread and actual.

That's it. That's why I call it oversimplified, lol.
 
Caveman":1ulydfl2 said:
Good enough. What are the basic parameters that drive the rating? Thanks.

In my system - simplied of course, ratings are assigned and based on the delta and the actual difference in the game adjustments are made.
example:

TeamA 150, teamB 100, based on the difference in ratings the game should be about a 50pt difference. They play the game and the final score is 30 - 20 thats a 10 pt difference so there needs to be adjustments made:
choices are:
TeamA was ranked to high but TeamB was ranked just right - adjustments would be TeamA loses 40 points team B stays the same OR
TeamA was ranked just right and TeamB was to low - adjustments would be TeamA stays the same and team B gains 40 points OR
somewhere in between.

My system adjusts based on how far the actual deviates from the projected so in this scenario A would move down but not to much as they still won and B would move up somewhat because they played within 1.4 scores so the adjustments might be TeamA - 5.5 to 144.5 and team B + 8.5 to 108.5. But each week the measure gets better as the teams approach an accurate rating. The amounts of change can change week to week because there is some curve fitting going on in the back ground and there are 6 possible formulas that can be applied. And twice a year/season I take the current power rating and go back to week 0 and calculate the deltas all the way forward again.
 
Thanks guys. I presume you have a program/spreadsheet to do this for you? I must have been absent the day this was taught in school!
 
Yes, I use excel and programmed in the formulas, but I have to enter the scores manually. Working on a tag picker to upload the scores automatically, but I have not got it perfected yet.
 
Back
Top