I tracked them mainly out of interest to see if scores/winners could be predicted (much like the toy) based on the aggregate scores for each division... this is the first year I have been doing this, what I think it shows, is that it should have been expected that both six man games should have been blowouts (and they were), and if you look at the average points scored graph, you can see that 3AD1 games were getting closer and closer in score every week, indicating that there was parity in that division (i.e., no one team really stood head and shoulders above the others), and that was shown by the championship score of 17-14... same thing with 4AD1.