I was wondering when we'd get the griping about the all state teams.
I think TAPPS does post each district's all-district selections on line. I think the answer to why Happy Hill wasn't as well represented on all-state might be found there. I haven't checked if those lists are online yet, so what follows is my supposition (and take it for what you've paid me to tell it to you...nothing).
If kids from other schools (remember, Notre Dame and Victory Life also were tri-champions of that district) were ranked BY THEIR COACHES ahead of Happy Hill, the all-state selection committee had to consider those prior choices BEFORE the Happy Hill kid could have been considered. And when you have three teams at the top instead of a nobody-can-deny-they-were-the-best-team situation (which we had with Fredericksburg Heritage and D4 had with Dickinson Pine Drive), it's gonna be tough to make those selections, especially in football where it is by position.
That's the rule that TAPPS instructs its districts and all-state selection committee to work under.
If the district didn't consider that, then they put their kids at a disadvantage. But I have to tell you, that in a district where three teams all were tied for the district crown, it's not easy to predict who makes the finals. Victory Life lost to Pine Drive and Heritage handled Notre Dame and Happy Hill pretty well. An upset (like the Pine Drive loss to Happy Hill) all of a sudden makes things look much different on December 3rd than it did in early November when the all-district teams were chosen BASED ON DISTRICT GAMES.
Let me give you a couple instances in other sports (football does have selections by position as opposed to basketball and volleyball, where athletes are chosen without regard to position). We always stopped our all-district selection process after 5 or 6 kids and asked each other, is this the BEST order to get the MOST kids from our district on all-state. For example, if you put a kid from an 0-12 team as your third selection for all-district, chances are you are only going to get two kids on all-state teams -- the third kid will be a "block" unless you can make a very, very, very convincing case why that kid was as good as you think he was. And if you can, friend, I can guarantee you that you should be doing something else for a living, because anyone who can "sell" that a kid on a 0-12 small private school team is all-state material has powers of persuasion that can make a lot more money than a small private school can afford to pay.
The kid can still be all-district; traditionally, the first ranked kid is the District MVP. The rest of them can be announced unranked with the ONLY place rankings mean anything is the all-state meeting. Remember the old joke: What do you call the guy who graduates last in his class at medical school? Answer: Doctor. Same holds true here. If you're #2 or #12, you're still all-district.
Several years ago, I sat in on an all-state volleyball meeting. One district sent its champion to the state finals, falling in the title game. However, the district decided that each school needed to have one kid on the first team all-district before a second kid from that school could be considered. So, the committee sits and chooses the #1 kid (from the runnerup school) on first team and maybe the #2 kid made second team. But the 3-4-5 ranked selections were pretty weak and there were better players from other districts. #6 was a very good player from the runnerup school and deserved first or second team honors. If the district had re-ordered its selections, it's probable that she and at least one or two kids could have made first or second team. If my feeble memory works right, I think the committee found a way to put those three kids on honorable mention so that the next kid got at least honorable mention. But she really deserved first or second team honors. That stinks.
Okay, so let's say that the committee says those doofuses over in East Bug Tussle Christian's district are fools and we'll fix their problem. Well, there was a soccer all-state committee that tried that a few years back. All of them were publicly reprimanded for their violation of the rule.
In both cases, the folks that should have been reprimanded are the idjits in the district committee who fought like cats and dogs so that somebody could one-up someone they couldn't do on the playing field. My rule on districts is that you can fight like family during the season, but when it comes to getting the most of your kids on all-state, you had better make up and be a good family together, because you can do most of your damage and minimize your all-state chances at that all-district meeting.