Will a crumbling helmet make football safer?

freeagent

Six-man pro
http://www.athleticbusiness.com/equ...ootball-safer.html?eid=317424636&bid=12751631

From Athletic Business Magazine (online edition)
By Jason Scott, January 2016

As concerns about concussions continue to grow, especially around football, companies and policy makers have been looking for ways to make the game safer.

One area of focus has been looking at improving the safety of equipment, football helmets in particular. Helmet manufacturers have been honing designs to help reduce impact to the brain, as well as incorporate technology to track hits or measure impacts.

Vicis, a startup company based in Seattle, has a different take on helmet design. With $10 million in funding, mostly from private investors, but also including $500 thousand from an NFL program supporting safety innovations, they say their goal is to reduce the incidence of concussions in football by 50 percent.
With that in mind, Vicis has manufactured a helmet called the Zero1. The key difference between this helmet and a traditional helmet is that it replaces a rigid outer shell with a softer outer skin with a harder plastic core inside. The softer shell gives a bit when struck, which, like a car’s bumper, slows the impact.

In addition to Zero1’s additional layers that dampen impact further, the helmet has four chinstraps that attach to the its inner shell as opposed to the outer shell, like a traditional helmet. Engineers think the interior chinstrap attachment could curb energy flowing through the jaw.

The main idea of diffusing energy comes from the auto industry, which found years ago that crushable materials are better at protecting people riding in cars because they absorb energy as they collapse.
Vicis helmets won’t come cheap, as the company expects the Zero1 will sell for $1,500 each – whereas traditional helmets retail for $200 to $400. The company hopes to target NFL and top college teams, and eventually to develop lower-priced models for high school and youth football.
 
Even if this technology works the big boys within the industry will use their congressman to block the competition ,so much for the free market place in America.
 
I know OBK will dispute this, but all of the helmets I wore had facemasks and no they were not leather. However, have read that concussions would be reduced if there were no facemasks and/or helmets.
 
HP Drifter":7kxvzicn said:
I know OBK will dispute this, but all of the helmets I wore had facemasks and no they were not leather. However, have read that concussions would be reduced if there were no facemasks and/or helmets.

I would have to agree, after researching/teaching/utilizing the "Hawk Tackling" method. Watching Aussie Rules Football/Rugby also confirms this for me. There would be face lacerations, but no face mask would certainly bring a new meaning to "stick your nose in there"
 
I agree, but one thing I am noticing some, when a player's helmet comes off some of them are continuing the play. I appreciate aggressiveness but guess is something new to deal with.
 
HP Drifter":2din37nd said:
I know OBK will dispute this, but all of the helmets I wore had facemasks and no they were not leather. However, have read that concussions would be reduced if there were no facemasks and/or helmets.
Without helmets, the boys would be less likely to use their head as a weapon, thus reducing head and neck injuries. However, when two noggins do collide, whether intentional or by accident, the result could be a lot worse.
 
Back
Top