Week 9

Moderators: freeagent, mjda76384, granger

Re: Week 9

Postby wths » Tue Oct 29, 2013 2:44 pm

Mr.Blue Sky wrote:Wths I knew valley use to be 11man they kind of bounced back, and fourth between the two. They didn't do all that great until they moved back to sixman in 98. What I was trying to say if Paducah would of moved down bout the same time we would have just as much or more success.


It was actually 2000 and I see your point but I don't agree with it.
wths
6-Man Fan
 
Posts: 263
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:01 am
Location: The Metroplex

Re: Week 9

Postby Mr.Blue Sky » Tue Oct 29, 2013 4:51 pm

Your right valley moved back in 2000 but began their run in 98. I didn't figure you would agree with me everybody has their own opinion. I figured your also from valley yourself. I know you remember the Dragon team from 04 that was very talented and let valley have that game by a miracle! I can assure you the teams from 2000-03 where even more talented and if they were to have played sixman they would of had some titles!
Mr.Blue Sky
6-Man Fan
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 8:30 pm

Re: Week 9

Postby rainjacktx » Wed Oct 30, 2013 7:09 am

Mr.Blue Sky wrote:Your right valley moved back in 2000 but began their run in 98. I didn't figure you would agree with me everybody has their own opinion. I figured your also from valley yourself. I know you remember the Dragon team from 04 that was very talented and let valley have that game by a miracle! I can assure you the teams from 2000-03 where even more talented and if they were to have played sixman they would of had some titles!


'If's and buts' is the diet of the mediocre.

Is Uncle Rico your hero? "If the coach would have put me in the game, we'd have won state. There's not a doubt in my mind"
rainjacktx
6-Man Fan
 
Posts: 2435
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 2:01 am
Location: nowhere special

Re: Week 9

Postby Mr.Blue Sky » Wed Oct 30, 2013 7:42 am

Lol hate on Paducah all you want but valley will never win a title in any sport they play.
Mr.Blue Sky
6-Man Fan
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 8:30 pm

Re: Week 9

Postby rainjacktx » Wed Oct 30, 2013 8:07 am

Coming from a guy who can't go three posts without revising historical fact with his interpretation of Uncle Rico's porch scene in "Napolean Dynamite", the use of an absolute such as 'never', is more comedic than it is insulting.
rainjacktx
6-Man Fan
 
Posts: 2435
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 2:01 am
Location: nowhere special

Re: Week 9

Postby wths » Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:12 am

Mr.Blue Sky wrote:Your right valley moved back in 2000 but began their run in 98. I didn't figure you would agree with me everybody has their own opinion. I figured your also from valley yourself. I know you remember the Dragon team from 04 that was very talented and let valley have that game by a miracle! I can assure you the teams from 2000-03 where even more talented and if they were to have played sixman they would of had some titles!



Nope wrong again not from Valley or close to Valley for that matter. Again that's your opinion on Paducah's talent and your entitled to it but I will say this, since 98 like you referenced as the beginning of their run, Paducah has had 9 winning seasons and Valley has had 16 or every year since 98. Now could have Paducah's teams been better had they been playing 6-man before the 2004 season? sure they could have but that doesn't mean they would have gotten a single trophy either. Just because a team that traditionally plays 11-man moves to 6-man does not mean they'll dominate the competition.
wths
6-Man Fan
 
Posts: 263
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:01 am
Location: The Metroplex

Re: Week 9

Postby Old Bearkat » Wed Oct 30, 2013 11:08 am

wths wrote:
Mr.Blue Sky wrote:Your right valley moved back in 2000 but began their run in 98. I didn't figure you would agree with me everybody has their own opinion. I figured your also from valley yourself. I know you remember the Dragon team from 04 that was very talented and let valley have that game by a miracle! I can assure you the teams from 2000-03 where even more talented and if they were to have played sixman they would of had some titles!



Nope wrong again not from Valley or close to Valley for that matter. Again that's your opinion on Paducah's talent and your entitled to it but I will say this, since 98 like you referenced as the beginning of their run, Paducah has had 9 winning seasons and Valley has had 16 or every year since 98. Now could have Paducah's teams been better had they been playing 6-man before the 2004 season? sure they could have but that doesn't mean they would have gotten a single trophy either. Just because a team that traditionally plays 11-man moves to 6-man does not mean they'll dominate the competition.


Only Jayton and Fort Hancock were able to do that. everyone else had to play 6 man for at least 3-5 years.
User avatar
Old Bearkat
6Man Authority
 
Posts: 6358
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2004 3:01 am
Location: Minooka, IL
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Week 9

Postby wths » Wed Oct 30, 2013 11:29 am

Old Bearkat wrote:
wths wrote:
Mr.Blue Sky wrote:Your right valley moved back in 2000 but began their run in 98. I didn't figure you would agree with me everybody has their own opinion. I figured your also from valley yourself. I know you remember the Dragon team from 04 that was very talented and let valley have that game by a miracle! I can assure you the teams from 2000-03 where even more talented and if they were to have played sixman they would of had some titles!



Nope wrong again not from Valley or close to Valley for that matter. Again that's your opinion on Paducah's talent and your entitled to it but I will say this, since 98 like you referenced as the beginning of their run, Paducah has had 9 winning seasons and Valley has had 16 or every year since 98. Now could have Paducah's teams been better had they been playing 6-man before the 2004 season? sure they could have but that doesn't mean they would have gotten a single trophy either. Just because a team that traditionally plays 11-man moves to 6-man does not mean they'll dominate the competition.


Only Jayton and Fort Hancock were able to do that. everyone else had to play 6 man for at least 3-5 years.



and that was back when 6-man first started correct?
wths
6-Man Fan
 
Posts: 263
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:01 am
Location: The Metroplex

Re: Week 9

Postby HP Drifter » Wed Oct 30, 2013 11:44 am

Not even close.
HP Drifter
6-Man Fan
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 2:32 pm

Re: Week 9

Postby Mr.Blue Sky » Wed Oct 30, 2013 12:58 pm

Rainjack valley=0 state titles.
Mr.Blue Sky
6-Man Fan
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 8:30 pm

Re: Week 9

Postby Old Bearkat » Wed Oct 30, 2013 1:28 pm

wths wrote:
Old Bearkat wrote:
wths wrote:
Mr.Blue Sky wrote:Your right valley moved back in 2000 but began their run in 98. I didn't figure you would agree with me everybody has their own opinion. I figured your also from valley yourself. I know you remember the Dragon team from 04 that was very talented and let valley have that game by a miracle! I can assure you the teams from 2000-03 where even more talented and if they were to have played sixman they would of had some titles!



Nope wrong again not from Valley or close to Valley for that matter. Again that's your opinion on Paducah's talent and your entitled to it but I will say this, since 98 like you referenced as the beginning of their run, Paducah has had 9 winning seasons and Valley has had 16 or every year since 98. Now could have Paducah's teams been better had they been playing 6-man before the 2004 season? sure they could have but that doesn't mean they would have gotten a single trophy either. Just because a team that traditionally plays 11-man moves to 6-man does not mean they'll dominate the competition.



Only Jayton and Fort Hancock were able to do that. everyone else had to play 6 man for at least 3-5 years.



and that was back when 6-man first started correct?


Nope. 1984-85/86-92
User avatar
Old Bearkat
6Man Authority
 
Posts: 6358
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2004 3:01 am
Location: Minooka, IL
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Week 9

Postby wths » Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:55 pm

K I didn't know that thank you sir
wths
6-Man Fan
 
Posts: 263
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:01 am
Location: The Metroplex

Re: Week 9

Postby sixmanfan2007 » Thu Oct 31, 2013 12:09 am

The Throckmorton team won state in their second year in 2005. I believe they lost to Richand in 2004 in the semifinals in a close game.
sixmanfan2007
6-Man Fan
 
Posts: 299
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 10:29 am

Re: Week 9

Postby wths » Thu Oct 31, 2013 7:51 am

sixmanfan2007 wrote:The Throckmorton team won state in their second year in 2005. I believe they lost to Richand in 2004 in the semifinals in a close game.



That's a good point, I stand corrected, I didn't even think about Throckmorton
wths
6-Man Fan
 
Posts: 263
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:01 am
Location: The Metroplex

Previous

Return to Div 1 - District 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest