by TebowTime15 » Fri Jul 24, 2020 3:11 pm
To quote Luke Skywalker "you'll find I'm full of surprises."
Seriously though, the 2nd amendment is a little different than other the amendments in the Bill of Rights. While some consider it "controversial," there has been surprising little litigation about it in comparison to amendments 1, 4, 5, 6, and 8. 3 and 7 are quirky in today's time while 9 and 10 are totally different animals all together.
In this instance, I didn't mean to bring up the Bill of Rights. In contrast, I did mean to bring it up when the UIL declared Landon Burkhart ineligible with at best circumstantial evidence and suggested the UIL should have to provide basic due process because it is an agent of the government. Since you did however, it will help me make my point.
Academics have one of the coolest and most important jobs; they get to decide what people accept as fact. What has happened over the years, however, is they are forced to say shocking things to get noticed by their peers. Since 99.9% are liberal, it turns into a bash white, heterosexual, Christian (especially Protestant,) males who are not disabled. Most of them make shocking arguments that possesses some merit but are probably not true. I suspect the "divine plagiarism" is in this category.
Although there are more liberal professors, I think Bill O'Reilly did the same thing in his book about Reagan. He basically argues in Killing Reagan that Ronald had episodes where all he could do is watch opera in the dark. That's absurd because Reagan had to make some very important decisions that could keep the Soviet Union going a little longer if he got it wrong. I suspect he probably suffered from headaches but not to the degree that it disabled him.
Bellesiles, however, purposely deflated the number of gun numbers in certain counties to argue the U.S. did not have a firearm culture before the Civil War. That seems absurd to most common sense people, oldgoat will probably add a line in the comments, but he won awards for it. The only reason he got caught is some graduate student studied the same thing and realized his numbers in like Kentucky were wrong. People started looking and a lot of his numbers were wrong.
Regardless of the subject, people are entitled to their own opinions but not their own facts. I'm not going to sit here and tell you the "divine plagiarism" theory is wrong because I do not read Hebrew, couldn't tell you the difference between the four gospels other than most prefer John, and have not studied the issue myself. I will tell you, however, it sounds, in my opinion, a lot like a narrative driven thesis.